STUDENTS' ERROR ANALYSIS IN COMPLETING TOEFL READING SECTION AT IAIN PAREPARE

Authors

  • Wahyu Pradana T Institut Agama Islam Negeri Parepare, Indonesia
  • Kalsum Kalsum Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58917/indolish.v2i1.836

Keywords:

Error Analysis, Reading Section, Time Management, TOEFL, Vocabulary

Abstract

This study analyzed students' errors in completing the reading section of the TOEFL test at IAIN Parepare and identified the factors that influenced those errors. The research responded to the need to understand specific reading-test difficulties faced by English Education students, particularly because TOEFL scores are commonly used for academic requirements and language proficiency evaluation. A descriptive qualitative design was employed. The participants were 28 English Education students selected through random sampling. The instruments consisted of TOEFL reading-section documentation containing 50 items and an interview guide. The data were analyzed through reduction, display, conclusion drawing, and percentage calculation. The findings showed that students made errors across all TOEFL reading aspects: main idea questions (62.14%), definition from structural clues (58.93%), tone, purpose, and course questions (65.00%), implied detail questions (67.86%), transition questions (66.43%), stated detail questions (63.57%), unstated detail questions (69.64%), and pronoun reference questions (65.48%). The most dominant error appeared in unstated detail questions. Interview results indicated that time management, unfamiliar vocabulary, and lengthy reading passages were the major factors influencing students' errors. The study concludes that TOEFL reading preparation should strengthen vocabulary mastery, skimming-scanning skills, and timed reading practice.

References

Abdussamad, H. Z., Papanna, P., Jalsan, F., & Syakir, K. (2021). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Syakir Media Press.

Basri, N. (2018). Student error analysis on their reading TOEFL test. English Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Muhammadiyah University of Makassar.

Breeland, H., Lee, Y. W., & Muraki, E. (2005). Comparability of TOEFL CBT essay prompts: Response-mode analyses. Educational and Psychological Measurement.

Fitria, T. N. (2022). An analysis of students' difficulty in reading the TOEFL prediction test. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra dan Seni, 23(2), 117-121.

Handayani, F. (2019). Structure and written expression section on paper-based TOEFL: Perceived difficulties by nursing students of Poltekkes Solo, West Sumatra. Journal Educative: Journal of Education Studies.

Lubis, L. R., Irmayana, A., & Nurbaidah, N. (2019). Analisis faktor kesulitan mahasiswa IPTS dalam menyelesaikan soal-soal TOEFL. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Multidisiplin Kisaran, Universitas Asahan.

Meadows, K. A. (2003). So you want to do research? 3. An introduction to qualitative methods. British Journal of Community Nursing.

Mezmir, E. A. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: An overview of data reduction, data display and interpretation. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(21).

Moglen, D. (2015). The re-placement test: Using TOEFL for purposes of placement. The CATESOL Journal, 27(1), 3-4.

Phillips, D. (2001). Longman complete course for the TOEFL test: Preparation for the computer and paper test. Pearson Education Company.

Rijali, A. (2018). Analisis data kualitatif. Jurnal Alhadharah, 17(33).

Riza, L. S., Anwar, F. S., Rahman, E. F., Abdullah, C. U., & Nazir, S. (2020). Natural language processing and Levenshtein distance for generating error identification typed question on TOEFL. Journal of Computers for Society, 1(1), 1-23.

Sesriyani, L. (2019). Kesulitan yang dihadapi mahasiswa pendidikan ekonomi dalam menyelesaikan reading section pada TOEFL. Jurnal Pendidikan, Hukum dan Bisnis.

Siahan, D. G., & Pangaribuan, M. (2022). The effect of using skimming and scanning on the students' ability in reading comprehension at grade X in SMA Kampus Nommensen. English Education Journal, 8(1), 31.

Xin, Z. (2008). Practice on assessing grammar and vocabulary: The case of the TOEFL. Education Review, 5(7).

Yoshinta, R., Yunianti, S. S., & Ramadhika, B. (2021). Structure and written expression of the TOEFL: Linguistic and non-linguistic constraints. Journal of Literature and Language Teaching, 12(1), 74.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

How to Cite

T, W. P., & Kalsum, K. (2026). STUDENTS’ ERROR ANALYSIS IN COMPLETING TOEFL READING SECTION AT IAIN PAREPARE. Journal of English Education, 2(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.58917/indolish.v2i1.836