THE EFFECT OF TURN-TAKING READING ACTIVITY ON STUDENTS’ INTEREST IN ENGLISH LITERACY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58917/aijes.v3i2.658Kata Kunci:
English Literacy, Students’ Interest, Turn-Taking Reading ActivityAbstrak
This study examined the effectiveness of a literacy-based activity, namely the turn-taking reading activity to enhance students’ interest in reading and writing in English. A comparative research design was employed to compare students who participated in the activity with those who did not. Data were collected through a questionnaire consisting of 20 items measuring students’ interest in English reading and writing. The data were analyzed using a t-test to determine whether a significant difference existed between the two groups. The findings revealed that the turn-taking reading activity significantly influenced students’ interest in reading and writing English. Students in the turn-taking reading activity group demonstrated high levels of interest in both reading and writing (Reading = 34, Writing =34). In contrast, students in the non-turn-taking reading activity group showed moderate interest (Reading = 29, Writing = 27). Overall, the results indicate that the turn-taking reading activity is an effective strategy for increasing students’ interest in English literacy skills.
Referensi
Abidin, Y., et,al. (2017). Pembelajaran literasi: Strategi meningkatkan kemampuan literasi matematika, sains, membaca, dan menulis. Bandung: Bumi Aksara.
Alexander, P. A., & Fox, E. (2018). Reading Research and Practice Over the Decades: A Historical Analysis 1. In Theoretical models and processes of literacy (pp. 35-64). Routledge.
Conradi, K., Jang, B. G., & McKenna, M. C. (2014). Motivation terminology in reading research: A conceptual review. Educational psychology review, 26(1), 127-164.
Fitriansyah, N., & Miftah, M. Z. (2020). Positive Connection of Extensive Reading and Writing Fluency in EFL Learning. LET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal, 10(2), 44–70. https://doi.org/10.18592/let.v10i2.4137
Genlott, Annika Agelli and Ake Gronlund. (2013) Improving Literacy Skills through Learning Reading by Writing: the iWTR Method Presented and Tested, Computers and Education, vol.67
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge university press.
Grabe, W., & Zhang, C. (2016). Reading-writing relationships in first and second language academic literacy development. Language Teaching, 49(3), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000082
Hayati, I., et.al. (2022. )The Effect Of Shared Reading Strategy on Students Reading Comprehension In Narrative Text at The Second Grade of SMPN 2 X Koto Tanah Datar In The Academic Year 2021/2022). Education: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Dan Pendidikan, 2(3), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.51903/education.v2i3.275
Hidi, S. E., & Renninger, K. A. (2019). Interest development and its relation to curiosity: Needed neuroscientific research. Educational Psychology Review, 31(4), 833-852.
Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing. Cambridge university press.
Jayanti, F. G. (2023). Integrating reading and writing in academic writing class. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v9i2.1513
Jayanti, M., Dewi, R. M., & Salimi, M. (2018). School Literacy Movement through Reading Angle Optimization in Classes to Improve Student Reading Interest. In Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHEs): Conference Series (Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 280-285).
Liu, F., & Xu, H. (2017). Effects of Educational Efficiency on National Competitiveness Based on Cross-National Data. Education Sciences, 7(4), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7040081
Nell K. Duke. (2006). Authentic Literacy Activities for Developing Comprehension and Writing. International Reading Association. pp. 344- 355
Nisa, I., & Heriyawati, D. F. (2022). The effect of reciprocal teaching strategy on students’ reading comprehension in narrative text. Edutec: Journal of Education and Technology, 6(2).
OECD. (2015). Skills for Social Progress: The Power of Social and Emotional Skills. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2019). OECD Skills Outlook 2019: Thriving in a Digital World. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/pisa-2022-results/
Soemer, A., & Schiefele, U. (2018). Reading amount as a mediator between intrinsic reading motivation and reading comprehension in the early elementary grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 1-11.
Suryaman, M. (2015). Analisis Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Dalam Literasi Membaca Melalui Studi Internasional (PIRLS) 2011. LITERA, 14(1).https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v14i1.4416
Rahmaniar, R., Surahmat, Z., & Sardi, A. (2023). A BOOK REVIEW: ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE FOR DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING LEARNERS:(Written by Ewa Domagała-Zyśk, Nuzha Moritz, and Anna Podlewska). Al-Irsyad: Journal of Education Science, 2(2), 147-152.
Sardi, A., Dollah, S., & Abdullah, A. (2025). Computer Assisted Language Instruction: AI-based English Teaching to English For Sciences Students. Indonesian TESOL Journal, 7(2), 81-92.
Suyono, S., Harsiati, T., & Wulandari, I. S. (2017). Implementasi gerakan literasi sekolah pada pembelajaran tematik di sekolah dasar. Sekolah Dasar: Kajian Teori Dan Praktik Pendidikan, 26(2), 116-123.
UNESCO. (2016). Fostering a culture of reading and writing. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2016). Global Education Monitoring Report 2016: Education for people and planet: Creating sustainable futures for all. UNESCO.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Utary Rustam, Ernawati Ernawati
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
